bobquasit: (Default)
bobquasit ([personal profile] bobquasit) wrote2006-02-19 11:05 pm
Entry tags:

Half-Assed Philosophy: Cheating and Women

I saw a question on Advicenators recently that led me to think seriously (for about fifteen seconds) about infidelity. Whoops! That didn't come out quite right. I meant about the topic of infidelity.

Specifically, the genetic consequences of infidelity. I like thinking about evolutionary psychology, even though I'm not at all qualified; it's a fascinating field.

After pondering for a few minutes, I reached the conclusion that for a heterosexual couple in a theoretically monogamous relationship, infidelity is much more of a threat to the male than to the female.

(Panic attack: is this obvious? Am I making an idiot of myself? Probably.)

If the female is unfaithful, the male may, without knowing it, lose the chance to reproduce. That is, genetically speaking, a death sentence.

If the male is unfaithful, however, his spouse doesn't lose anything genetically; it is, after all, impossible for her to be deceived as to the parentage of her children. She knows that she's the mother, and at a minimum will know that the father may be one of several men. Her own reproduction is not threatened.

So it's worse for a man when a woman cheats, than for a woman when a man cheats.

I will now issue a couple of disclaimers:

1. Disease is a factor that I didn't include. What effect do you think it would have?

2. The emotional impact of infidelity is certainly something to be considered. Is a male who is unfaithful to his spouse more likely to leave her and any children they may have? Possibly. But the same applies to females - a woman who cheats is more likely to leave her spouse, too, and probably to the same degree of likelihood as a male. Isn't she?

Incidentally, I didn't answer the question on Advicenators. The only answer I could have given wasn't something that the questioner would want to hear. In my experience, that usually means a low rating or no rating at all. It's not worth it.

[identity profile] tprjones.livejournal.com 2006-02-20 05:44 pm (UTC)(link)
What I find most interesting when thinking about these things from the standpoint of what evolution would dictate, is that in order to be most successful women should be unfaithful. In order to successfully raise children in a cruel world a woman requires a loyal and supportive mate who will take care of her and her offspring, and so she will tend to marry the "safe guy" who will do just that. At the same time in order to give her male offspring the best chance at breeding as much as possible she needs to cheat on the "safe guy" and have someone more prolific actually father the children, and thus will be sexually attracted to the "bad boy" who is more likely to have equally aggressive and promiscuious offspring.

It's in her best interests to bond with the "safe guy" but cheat on him and never let him find out the kids aren't his. Fascinating, IMO.

[identity profile] bobquasit.livejournal.com 2006-02-20 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)
It's comments like this that make me profoundly grateful that Sebastian looks SO much like me...and that we don't have any red-haired male friends. :D

[identity profile] klyfix.livejournal.com 2006-02-21 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
Uhhh....

Have you looked at my old SD driver's licence?

My hair used to be really, really red.

[identity profile] bobquasit.livejournal.com 2006-02-21 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
Damn, you're right! Sorry, I forgot about that. On the other hand, your hair is incredibly curly, and Sebastian's is straight.

And...well, you've seen him, so you know: there aren't many kids in the world who look more like their father. I got so sick of those damned Mini-Me jokes...

[identity profile] klyfix.livejournal.com 2006-02-21 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
True; I'm nearly a sheep hair-wise. :)