bobquasit: (Default)
bobquasit ([personal profile] bobquasit) wrote2006-05-07 10:55 pm
Entry tags:

Meme it

This is not a meme.

Correction, maybe this IS a meme that someone already made. But if it is, I haven't run across it.

If I could create some sort of program to do this, I would.

But anyway, I noticed that profiles show how many comments you've made, and how many comments you've received. In my case, I've posted 1,821, and received: 2,204. Thus my rate of return is 1.21, which means that I get six comments back for every five I make - recognizing, of course, that the giving and receiving are almost certainly unrelated.

I should also note that this probably doesn't reflect postings on communities. Likewise, I'm not at all sure how a comment that I do myself would affect the numbers. I checked things out with LJ Comments Stats Wizard tonight, and it says that excluding anonymous and self-comments, my received comment total is 1,490.

Still, this does seem to indicate that I get more out of LJ than I put into it - or close to it.

So I started looking at some of the people on my flist. I'll use no names, but...the results honestly surprised me in many cases. Check out this partial table:

"Balance" means the ratio of comments posted to comments received; a value less than 1 indicates that the person gets fewer comments than they give. Depending on how you look at it, you could say that they're not getting what they deserve from LJ.

The thing is, in most cases what I expected was very different from reality.
Posted	Received	Balance
4764	1606		0.337111671
616	305		0.49512987
2312	1405		0.607698962
1466	1131		0.77148704
13056	11984		0.917892157
3410	3620		1.061583578
28861	32688		1.132601088
1821	2204		1.210323998 (me)
10568	12901		1.220760787
330	425		1.287878788
7182	11169		1.555137845

I'd blather on more about this, but it's late and I'm tired.

[identity profile] tprjones.livejournal.com 2006-05-08 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
Heh. My ratio is 0.129213483

I guess that means I'm not really all that liked on LJ, maybe?

[identity profile] bobquasit.livejournal.com 2006-05-08 03:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Either that, or you're a giver rather than a taker - if you want to try to look at it in a positive light.

Or, to be honest, the entire concept is fucked up. When you add in community commenting and self-commenting, the whole balance idea pretty much collapses under its own weight.

Oops! :D

My Tally (for your comparison)

[identity profile] unquietsoul5.livejournal.com 2006-05-08 01:09 pm (UTC)(link)

Posted: 6,173 - Received: 4,859

You also might want to note in your info comparisons based on number of journal entries, as I actually know some folks who just comment on others LJs and don't actually post in their journal very much at all.

Journal entries for me: 2,826

So yes, you get more comments in comparison to the number given. It's one of the reasons why I get a bit frustrated with my journal in comparison and then hearing you complain about your invisibility. I'm running at 0.7871375 in regards to your balance. Putting in more effort than I'm getting back.... But I also average 1.7193913 comments received for each journal entry, by those numbers.

Unfortunately I can't verify this, since the software records don't show it, but I beleive in general my number of comments received is dropping over time and my number of comments to others increasing. There's been a huge churn of readers and who's actually on LJ in the past year, and a lot of the folks on my Flist end up as dead accounts over time..

Re: My Tally (for your comparison)

[identity profile] bobquasit.livejournal.com 2006-05-08 03:16 pm (UTC)(link)
The whole concept does seem hopelessly tangled, in retrospect.

But I was up way too late last night, my head feels like it's filled with fuzzy cotton, and I'm not thinking well right now.

Having said that, LJ does seem to be a lot quieter lately. And I haven't been commenting on my flist as much as I used to. Nor have I done any fiction for a while now, although I don't know if that means anything.

I'm really not thinking well right now.

Maybe we should all move to MySpace. What do you think? :D

Re: My Tally (for your comparison)

[identity profile] unquietsoul5.livejournal.com 2006-05-08 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Considering our ages? We'd be instant suspects of being child stalkers, considering the demographics there and the reputation of that place in general.

No Thanks :-)

[identity profile] dancing-kiralee.livejournal.com 2006-05-08 01:10 pm (UTC)(link)
That depends...

My ratio is 295 posted to 30 recieved, or 0.1016949. But my goal, in joining LJ, was to be able to post comments, not to write my own journal. So that just proves I'm getting what I want out of it.

The key is that people respond to (and appreciate) my comments. But that's not what LJ is tracking - at least not in this case.

Kiralee

[identity profile] bobquasit.livejournal.com 2006-05-08 03:20 pm (UTC)(link)
That reminds me: at some point after I wrote this, it occurred to me to wonder what we're all writing here on LJ for. But right now I'm far too brain-fuddled to try to come up with an answer. I'm glad that you've worked out your own answer, though!

[identity profile] dancing-kiralee.livejournal.com 2006-05-09 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm looking for a place to practice writing casually - that is being able to write without the internal editor taking over. It helps if I can think of it as a dialog, which is why I'm mostly looking to make comments.

It's also a lot of fun and an effective way (for me anyway) to socialize.

As for what most people are doing here... it looks to me like most of the people here are writing journals, not that much different than the pen and paper journals of years / decades / centuries past. Now, I'm not certain why so many people like journal writing (either now or in the past) but clearly there's a call for it.

Kiralee