The New York Times had an article today about the Wii vs. PS3 situation, and I was delighted to see that the Wii is doing even better than before. Nintendo's stock prices are up 40%, and Sony's stock is taking a big hit. Wii is even selling far better than the Xbox 360 did in the same launch period (the Xbox 360 launched ten months ago).
The Wii is selling out as soon as it's available, and the PS3 isn't selling quite as fast. That may actually be good for Sony, because they lose money on every PS3 that they sell. While Nintendo actually makes a profit on each Wii.
Why do I care about all this? Because I like to see intelligent thinking be rewarded. Microsoft and Sony kept working on these ridiculously expensive, super-high-resolution graphics-intense-to-the-point-of-raving-psychosis game systems...and frankly, they took video gaming away from me. I couldn't afford those systems, and even if I could, I wouldn't be willing to play John Madden Football XXIXXXVLCIXXXXVI, no matter how many gigapixels they used to render the sweat-drops on each flawlessly digitized steroid-crazed football "hero".
Nintendo blew the doors off their behemoth-sized competition by bringing fun back to console gaming. It's a classic David & Goliath; not one game pundit thought that Nintendo had the slightest prayer of challenging Microsoft or Sony for second place, and now it looks very possible that Nintendo will end up back on top of the market.
But the thing that has really impressed me is the comments on the Time's story. Out of 130 messages so far, I've seen 128 in praise of the Wii, and only one each that prefer the Xbox 360 or PS3. That's pretty stunning. Unless some Nintendo group out there has been Freeping the comments, it also seems a pretty good sign that Sony and Microsoft are headed for a thumpin'.
And that suits me just fine.
The Wii is selling out as soon as it's available, and the PS3 isn't selling quite as fast. That may actually be good for Sony, because they lose money on every PS3 that they sell. While Nintendo actually makes a profit on each Wii.
Why do I care about all this? Because I like to see intelligent thinking be rewarded. Microsoft and Sony kept working on these ridiculously expensive, super-high-resolution graphics-intense-to-the-point-of-raving-psychosis game systems...and frankly, they took video gaming away from me. I couldn't afford those systems, and even if I could, I wouldn't be willing to play John Madden Football XXIXXXVLCIXXXXVI, no matter how many gigapixels they used to render the sweat-drops on each flawlessly digitized steroid-crazed football "hero".
Nintendo blew the doors off their behemoth-sized competition by bringing fun back to console gaming. It's a classic David & Goliath; not one game pundit thought that Nintendo had the slightest prayer of challenging Microsoft or Sony for second place, and now it looks very possible that Nintendo will end up back on top of the market.
But the thing that has really impressed me is the comments on the Time's story. Out of 130 messages so far, I've seen 128 in praise of the Wii, and only one each that prefer the Xbox 360 or PS3. That's pretty stunning. Unless some Nintendo group out there has been Freeping the comments, it also seems a pretty good sign that Sony and Microsoft are headed for a thumpin'.
And that suits me just fine.