Feb. 14th, 2008

bobquasit: (Default)
From the discussion thread for For those of you who used to go to church, but have stopped for whatever reason -



[user], I'm sorry that you feel that the vote was invalid.

Like you, I generally give everybody a 3 or better, just for answering - unless their answer is simply awful. If it's just a headline (with maybe one sentence that doesn't really answer the question), or is abusive, or is spam that doesn't relate to the subject, I'll give two stars. In very rare cases I'll give one for the very worst answers.

Just a reminder: you have the option of appealing the results, of course.

Will you accept a sermon from an old grammarian? Formatting matters. When your answer is one giant paragraph, it becomes much harder to read. It's like trying to jam a whole steak in your mouth at once - it's not a comfortable experience for the reader!

It's much easier to read text if it's broken up into relatively smaller paragraphs. Generally, most paragraphs should consist of 3-5 sentences each. Of course, that's not a hard-and-fast rule. Once in a while a one-sentence paragraph can also be an effective way to shake things up or add emphasis.

Like this.

White space matters in writing. It makes your text much easier to read. And it doesn't really take much longer to apply; all you have to do is hit the Enter key a couple of times, every few sentences. If you can break up the paragraphs thematically, so much the better. :D

I could also go on about using headings, numbering, and text formatting (where appropriate) to enhance readability, but I fear I've gone on too long already. The point that I'm trying to make is this: you're putting a lot of work and thought into your answers, so I think it would be worth your while to take the final step and do a little final-formatting.

Otherwise, it's like slaving away over a hot stove to make a really fine meal for your friends, and serving it on dirty paper plates. Poor presentation can defeat your whole purpose!

Sorry to have gone on for so long and to sound so preachy, but I've seen too many fine answers end up ruined by difficult-to-read formatting.

But I will note that your spelling (or spell-checking) is excellent.


What do you think - too preachy and schoolmarm-ish?
bobquasit: (Default)
From the discussion thread for For those of you who used to go to church, but have stopped for whatever reason -



[user], I'm sorry that you feel that the vote was invalid.

Like you, I generally give everybody a 3 or better, just for answering - unless their answer is simply awful. If it's just a headline (with maybe one sentence that doesn't really answer the question), or is abusive, or is spam that doesn't relate to the subject, I'll give two stars. In very rare cases I'll give one for the very worst answers.

Just a reminder: you have the option of appealing the results, of course.

Will you accept a sermon from an old grammarian? Formatting matters. When your answer is one giant paragraph, it becomes much harder to read. It's like trying to jam a whole steak in your mouth at once - it's not a comfortable experience for the reader!

It's much easier to read text if it's broken up into relatively smaller paragraphs. Generally, most paragraphs should consist of 3-5 sentences each. Of course, that's not a hard-and-fast rule. Once in a while a one-sentence paragraph can also be an effective way to shake things up or add emphasis.

Like this.

White space matters in writing. It makes your text much easier to read. And it doesn't really take much longer to apply; all you have to do is hit the Enter key a couple of times, every few sentences. If you can break up the paragraphs thematically, so much the better. :D

I could also go on about using headings, numbering, and text formatting (where appropriate) to enhance readability, but I fear I've gone on too long already. The point that I'm trying to make is this: you're putting a lot of work and thought into your answers, so I think it would be worth your while to take the final step and do a little final-formatting.

Otherwise, it's like slaving away over a hot stove to make a really fine meal for your friends, and serving it on dirty paper plates. Poor presentation can defeat your whole purpose!

Sorry to have gone on for so long and to sound so preachy, but I've seen too many fine answers end up ruined by difficult-to-read formatting.

But I will note that your spelling (or spell-checking) is excellent.


What do you think - too preachy and schoolmarm-ish?
bobquasit: (Default)
I suspect that everyone is sick of my Hillary/Obama posts. I'll try to stop making them. But I want to copy this CNN comment here, because I don't know if it will survive moderation:


I was an Edwards supporter, but I've noticed a few things that I keep seeing from Hillary supporters:

1. "We don't know anything about Obama's positions - he's a cipher!"

He has a website, and it has detailed position papers. Google for Obama, and there it is. Or better still, here's the link:

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

If you don't want to bother, then please be honest about that and stop pretending that he has no positions.

2. "Hillary has EXPERIENCE!"

Experience doing what? Sleeping in the White House? George W. Bush has more of that kind of experience than she does! Did that make HIM a great President?

Or do you mean that she has more experience in the Senate? But she doesn't have THAT much more experience than Obama, and by that criteria John McCain beats them both, twice over, COMBINED. Does it make sense for Democrats to say that experience is the key qualification in this election?

And exactly what has Hillary's experience accomplished? She voted in favor of the Iraq war authorization, the bankruptcy bill (a gift to the credit card industry at the expense of the working poor) and the Iran "terrorist" bill - which practically INVITES Bush and Cheney to attack Iran. And she sponsored the pandering and idiotic flag-burning bill. Plus her campaign managed to blow through tens of millions of dollars in the biggest display of fiscal irresponsibility in DECADES.

Is this the sort of experience America needs?

3. "If you vote for Obama, it must be because you're black. Or you're a guilt-ridden white liberal. And you're a sexist pig because you're voting against a woman."

This is the sort of argument that really pushed me into Obama's camp. I'm not voting against a *woman* - I'm voting for THE BETTER CANDIDATE, irrespective of race or gender. By constantly playing the race/gender card, the Hillary campaign and their supporters have been dragging the Democratic Party down into the mud. And we'll all pay the price, if we're not careful.

America desperately needs great leadership to bring us back to the sane, fiscally responsible, non-torturing democracy we used to be. I don't know if Obama is the one who can take us there. But I think he'll try - and I'm very sure that neither John McCain nor Hillary Clinton will.
bobquasit: (Default)
I suspect that everyone is sick of my Hillary/Obama posts. I'll try to stop making them. But I want to copy this CNN comment here, because I don't know if it will survive moderation:


I was an Edwards supporter, but I've noticed a few things that I keep seeing from Hillary supporters:

1. "We don't know anything about Obama's positions - he's a cipher!"

He has a website, and it has detailed position papers. Google for Obama, and there it is. Or better still, here's the link:

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

If you don't want to bother, then please be honest about that and stop pretending that he has no positions.

2. "Hillary has EXPERIENCE!"

Experience doing what? Sleeping in the White House? George W. Bush has more of that kind of experience than she does! Did that make HIM a great President?

Or do you mean that she has more experience in the Senate? But she doesn't have THAT much more experience than Obama, and by that criteria John McCain beats them both, twice over, COMBINED. Does it make sense for Democrats to say that experience is the key qualification in this election?

And exactly what has Hillary's experience accomplished? She voted in favor of the Iraq war authorization, the bankruptcy bill (a gift to the credit card industry at the expense of the working poor) and the Iran "terrorist" bill - which practically INVITES Bush and Cheney to attack Iran. And she sponsored the pandering and idiotic flag-burning bill. Plus her campaign managed to blow through tens of millions of dollars in the biggest display of fiscal irresponsibility in DECADES.

Is this the sort of experience America needs?

3. "If you vote for Obama, it must be because you're black. Or you're a guilt-ridden white liberal. And you're a sexist pig because you're voting against a woman."

This is the sort of argument that really pushed me into Obama's camp. I'm not voting against a *woman* - I'm voting for THE BETTER CANDIDATE, irrespective of race or gender. By constantly playing the race/gender card, the Hillary campaign and their supporters have been dragging the Democratic Party down into the mud. And we'll all pay the price, if we're not careful.

America desperately needs great leadership to bring us back to the sane, fiscally responsible, non-torturing democracy we used to be. I don't know if Obama is the one who can take us there. But I think he'll try - and I'm very sure that neither John McCain nor Hillary Clinton will.

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30 31     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 12:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios