Elbow on the mend

I just had new x-rays and saw the orthopedist. The chip is in a good position and should heal without intervention. It's not exactly against the bone on one edge, but that's normal and fine; the space will fill in with bone. The joint is stable, and with physical therapy I should be able to recover full strength and range of motion. I start therapy on Monday.

I'm to use the arm more, avoiding heavy lifting, twisting, and yard work. I can use the computer, and I don't have to wear the sling during the day. I should consider still wearing it at night, however.

All in all, good news!

Elbow on the mend

I just had new x-rays and saw the orthopedist. The chip is in a good position and should heal without intervention. It's not exactly against the bone on one edge, but that's normal and fine; the space will fill in with bone. The joint is stable, and with physical therapy I should be able to recover full strength and range of motion. I start therapy on Monday.

I'm to use the arm more, avoiding heavy lifting, twisting, and yard work. I can use the computer, and I don't have to wear the sling during the day. I should consider still wearing it at night, however.

All in all, good news!

The evils of a minimum wage

Someone irritated me greatly over on Askville by asking why it is that "conclusions" of economics are not generally accepted - such as, specifically, the "evils of a minimum wage".

Sometimes I wonder if anyone over on Askville ever asks an honest question. It seems that nine out of ten of them are asked to evangelize a religion, propagandize a political position or candidate, or sell something. The spammers may be the most honest of the lot!

Anyway, here's what I wrote in response:

---

"Evils" of a minimum wage?

I think that particular "conclusion" isn't accepted because A) it's not a generally agreed-upon conclusion of economics (except among right-wing "free market" radicals and libertarians), and B) the ruthless and destructive behavior of many of America's most prominent corporations has made it eminently clear to anyone with a functioning brain that without a minimum wage, corporations would happily pay workers a penny a day - as they practically do in many parts of the world - and simply replace their workers as they drop off the economic map into utter poverty.

The problem with free-market fanatics is that they fail to recognize that human beings have worth that cannot be calculated in dollars and cents. And that there's a world of things out there that are, likewise, beyond price. How much would you pay for your next breath of air?

The evils of a minimum wage

Someone irritated me greatly over on Askville by asking why it is that "conclusions" of economics are not generally accepted - such as, specifically, the "evils of a minimum wage".

Sometimes I wonder if anyone over on Askville ever asks an honest question. It seems that nine out of ten of them are asked to evangelize a religion, propagandize a political position or candidate, or sell something. The spammers may be the most honest of the lot!

Anyway, here's what I wrote in response:

---

"Evils" of a minimum wage?

I think that particular "conclusion" isn't accepted because A) it's not a generally agreed-upon conclusion of economics (except among right-wing "free market" radicals and libertarians), and B) the ruthless and destructive behavior of many of America's most prominent corporations has made it eminently clear to anyone with a functioning brain that without a minimum wage, corporations would happily pay workers a penny a day - as they practically do in many parts of the world - and simply replace their workers as they drop off the economic map into utter poverty.

The problem with free-market fanatics is that they fail to recognize that human beings have worth that cannot be calculated in dollars and cents. And that there's a world of things out there that are, likewise, beyond price. How much would you pay for your next breath of air?